- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 08:09:49 +0000
- To: public-html@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7010 Summary: Making <applet> non-conforming may hinder royalty-free <video> adoption Product: HTML WG Version: unspecified Platform: PC OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Spec bugs AssignedTo: dave.null@w3.org ReportedBy: hsivonen@iki.fi QAContact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org CC: ian@hixie.ch, mike@w3.org, public-html@w3.org http://www.bluishcoder.co.nz/2009/06/video-for-everybody-html-5-video.html#9069120310304449626 cites <applet> being non-conforming as a reason not to use Cortado as a fallback for <video>. If one wants to serve royalty-free Ogg video using <video> to Firefox 3.5, Chrome 3 and Safari 3.1 or later + XiphQT and still have a fallback for IE and Opera, it seems that it would be useful to be able to use a single no-JavaScript <applet> fallback for both IE and Opera without having a validator whine about it. If one only wants to have a Cortado fallback in IE assuming Opera ships <video> soon enough, one could use <object>, but according to Sun's documentation[1], that alternative required the classid attribute which is also non-conforming in HTML5. Please allow a conforming and easy-to-author way to fall back onto Cortado in desktop browsers that don't support <video>. After all, <video> has *designed* fallback mechanism. It's rather silly if using the mechanism is non-conforming. [1] http://java.sun.com/javase/6/docs/technotes/guides/plugin/developer_guide/using_tags.html -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 10 June 2009 08:09:55 UTC