- From: Steven Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 12:15:11 +0100
- To: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
- Cc: "public-html@w3.org WG" <public-html@w3.org>, Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net>, marco.zehe@googlemail.com, "Gregory J. Rosmaita" <oedipus@hicom.net>
Hi henri, >I still think that the best way to proceed would be getting data on what experienced screen reader users actually choose to do when they can opt in or out of >having summaries read. The most popular screenreader JAWS does not provide an option to turn summary off/on, if it is there and is on a "data table" it is announced, prefixed by with "summary" The "experienced screen reader users" I have spoken to (marco zehe, gregory rosmaita and janina sajka) indicated that they find the summary information useful, when they encounter it. regards stevef 2009/6/8 Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>: > (This was supposed to go to list. Resending.) > > On Jun 8, 2009, at 13:09, Steven Faulkner wrote: > >>> - this means that accessibility is harmed by the summary attribute. >> >> As I have pointed out previously on this point, many of the bogus >> examples of summary attribute use are never announced by screen >> readers (that support @summary) as they are found on tables used for >> layout, which the screen readers ignore via the use of heuristics to >> filter out inapropriate table use. > > Indeed, that mitigates one side of harm and is easy to forget. (I forgot > about it earlier today.) It doesn't mitigate the harm that the opportunity > cost of writing bogus summaries that never get announced poses, though. > > When summary does get announced, where is the data that follows the best > practice found? Is it only found on .gov sites or intranets? Based on > Philip's survey, the data out there on the public Web is overwhelmingly > bogus or at best caption-like in character even if a heuristic prunes some > of the data out. > > (I still think that the best way to proceed would be getting data on what > experienced screen reader users actually choose to do when they can opt in > or out of having summaries read. Having that data would make most of the > surrounding debate moot, since it would be pretty pointless to argue with > the revealed preference of the actual constituency regardless of which way > the preference actually goes.) > > -- > Henri Sivonen > hsivonen@iki.fi > http://hsivonen.iki.fi/ > > > -- with regards Steve Faulkner Technical Director - TPG Europe Director - Web Accessibility Tools Consortium www.paciellogroup.com | www.wat-c.org Web Accessibility Toolbar - http://www.paciellogroup.com/resources/wat-ie-about.html
Received on Monday, 8 June 2009 11:15:50 UTC