Re: Why Design Principles?

On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
> > Larry wrote: 
> > < In 2007, an agreement was reached between WHATWG and W3C to
> > < work together on HTML, starting from the WHATWG document already
> > < under development. The W3C HTML was formed.
> 
> That sequence of events is not chronologically accurate. The W3C HTML WG 
> was planned largely without formal input from the WHAT WG.

Actually this is an understatement. The W3C at no time contacted the 
WHATWG, and did not contact me until I had sent unsolicited input -- and 
even then, the contact was in the form of unofficial back-channel 
questions. I don't think the W3C ever officially acknowledged the 
existence of the WHATWG until the charter was published.

(Furthermore, many parts of my feedback were ignored; for instance, the 
timeline I put forward, which so far has proved quite accurate, was 
ignored in favour of a fantasy that would have us in CR right now (!)).

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'

Received on Wednesday, 3 June 2009 21:52:20 UTC