- From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
- Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 12:13:23 -0700
- To: John Foliot <jfoliot@stanford.edu>
- Cc: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, public-html@w3.org
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 11:20 AM, John Foliot <jfoliot@stanford.edu> wrote: > Jonas Sicking wrote: >> >> Additionally, I given how easy it is to get unexpected results, I >> think we should strongly discourage authors from not escaping >> ampersands. And the best tool that we have for doing that is by making >> unescaped ampersands non-conformant. >> >> / Jonas > > Good Luck with that Jonas. They will never use non-conformance* as a tool > to modify author behavior, as they are completely unwilling to attach > critical fail to non-conformance, and without that, what other penalty > would you propose? A "tsk tsk" from Henri's validator? Ouch, that > hurts... Is there a purpose to the above other than just trying to be inflammatory? Are you requesting any changes to the spec? / Jonas
Received on Tuesday, 2 June 2009 19:15:08 UTC