- From: Rob Sayre <rsayre@mozilla.com>
- Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2009 13:09:54 -0400
- To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- CC: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Leif Halvard Silli <lhs@malform.no>, Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>, "Dailey, David P." <david.dailey@sru.edu>, Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
On 6/1/09 7:01 AM, Sam Ruby wrote: > From my point of view, a push to publish a Design Principles document > as a formal W3C Note is a distraction. To be clear, I am not saying > that the Design Principles document itself isn't useful and > interesting, but the effort to publish it as a Note means that the > details of the wording is something that must be discussed. There seem to be group members laboring under the assumption that the Design Principles document does not apply to their suggestions or objections. I would like to put that two year old distraction to rest. There may be wiggle room in some of the points, but that's not concerning. My view is that suggestions and objections that violate the Design Principles document in obvious ways will not be taken seriously by browser vendors. - Rob
Received on Monday, 1 June 2009 17:10:34 UTC