- From: Leif Halvard Silli <lhs@malform.no>
- Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 20:23:08 +0200
- To: "Patrick H. Lauke" <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- CC: public-html <public-html@w3.org>
Patrick H. Lauke On 09-07-29 19.20: > Lachlan Hunt wrote: > >> We're not breaking compatibility. PHP never had any real >> compatibility, in the sense you are claiming, with HTML, SGML or XML. >> We're just clearing up the fiction about PHP itself being conforming >> HTML, or even SGML or XML for that matter. > > Breaking my usual silence to Seems like we are all behaving in our usual ways, then. > just +1 this (and this despite being a PHP man by trade). Why do you say +1 to completely different rules for HTML compared to HTML 4.01, XHTML including XHTML 5, and XML. And to non-validity for <? ?> from begin with, something e.g. <% %> isn't suffering? Is this view based on a view on how PHP should be used? In other words, is it a PHP based argument, or what? -- leif halvard silli
Received on Wednesday, 29 July 2009 18:23:54 UTC