- From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 18:22:22 +0100
- To: public-html <public-html@w3.org>
Leif Halvard Silli wrote: > Disagreed. But let's ignore that. So, you are after teaching e.g. users > of WYSIWYG tools that "<?php ?>" isn't valid HTML because it isn't a PI. > A convoluted message. But at that point the users aren't writing/authoring HTML, they're authoring PHP? P -- Patrick H. Lauke ______________________________________________________________ re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively [latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.] www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk http://redux.deviantart.com | http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ ______________________________________________________________ Co-lead, Web Standards Project (WaSP) Accessibility Task Force http://webstandards.org/ ______________________________________________________________
Received on Wednesday, 29 July 2009 17:23:13 UTC