W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > July 2009

Re: Discussion: Accessibility Issues Procedure

From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2009 07:36:13 -0400
Message-ID: <4A6C3FAD.1090504@intertwingly.net>
To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
CC: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, William Loughborough <wloughborough@gmail.com>, Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>, W3C WAI-XTECH <wai-xtech@w3.org>, Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
Ian Hickson wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Jul 2009, Sam Ruby wrote:
>> Let me enumerate a few possible ways forward. [...]
>> Option #5 is to accept what currently is in Ian's draft.
> Option #6 is for people to actually respond to my requests for 
> explanations of the various proposals that people have made, so that I can 
> actually understand people's positions. As has been demonstrated multiple 
> times even with the summary="" attribute, when people make reasoned 
> arguments and demonstrate why their proposals are a good idea, I change 
> the spec to follow them.


- Sam Ruby
Received on Sunday, 26 July 2009 11:37:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 9 October 2021 18:44:51 UTC