W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > July 2009

Re: Draft of @summary text for HTML 5 poll

From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 04:08:35 -0600
Cc: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
Message-id: <38E2AE80-9DD6-4011-A59A-C3FBC63830BB@apple.com>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>

On Jul 24, 2009, at 3:53 AM, Julian Reschke wrote:

> Ian Hickson wrote:
>> On Fri, 24 Jul 2009, Laura Carlson wrote:
>>>> HTML5 already allows the summary="" attribute
>>> Do you mean the editor's draft or the latest published draft?
>> The latest editor's draft. We can publish it as a WD if that would  
>> make it more meaningful.
>> I don't think there's much point talking about the latest /TR/  
>> version, I mean, it was obsolete before it got published.
> The fact that published Working Drafts age does not make them  
> useless. On the other hand, the fact that they are stable makes them  
> a good base for reviews from outside the working group.

But it would be pretty silly to word a Working Group internal vote  
based on the last Working Draft, rather than the current Editor's  
Draft. Particularly on an issue where the Editor's Draft was recently  
changed in response to Working Group feedback.

Received on Friday, 24 July 2009 10:09:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 9 October 2021 18:44:51 UTC