- From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 04:08:35 -0600
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
On Jul 24, 2009, at 3:53 AM, Julian Reschke wrote: > Ian Hickson wrote: >> On Fri, 24 Jul 2009, Laura Carlson wrote: >>>> HTML5 already allows the summary="" attribute >>> Do you mean the editor's draft or the latest published draft? >> The latest editor's draft. We can publish it as a WD if that would >> make it more meaningful. >> I don't think there's much point talking about the latest /TR/ >> version, I mean, it was obsolete before it got published. > > The fact that published Working Drafts age does not make them > useless. On the other hand, the fact that they are stable makes them > a good base for reviews from outside the working group. But it would be pretty silly to word a Working Group internal vote based on the last Working Draft, rather than the current Editor's Draft. Particularly on an issue where the Editor's Draft was recently changed in response to Working Group feedback. Regards, Maciej
Received on Friday, 24 July 2009 10:09:22 UTC