W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > July 2009

Re: PROPOSAL: Procedure to Promote Progress With Accessibility Issues in HTML5

From: Joshue O Connor <joshue.oconnor@cfit.ie>
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 15:07:25 +0100
Message-ID: <4A647A1D.5050300@cfit.ie>
To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Cc: David Poehlman <david.poehlman@handsontechnologeyes.com>, Steven Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>, Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>, W3C WAI-XTECH <wai-xtech@w3.org>, wai-liaison@w3.org, Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net>
Ian Hickson wrote:
>  (I have been informed that in fact the WAI groups are more interested in voting on 
> whether summary="" is in or out than on voting on what accessibility 
> solutions should be used to make tables accessible, for instance.)

and again.

> Can the WAI commit to approaching accessibility issues holistically, 
> instead of following one-solution agendas as I was recently informed is 
> explicitly being done with the summary="" issue?

What is that supposed to mean? We are /all/ about holistic solutions,
however the current vote (as I understand it) is to be about @summary as
it currently is. While we (PF) do wish to talk about engineering a
better solution (as I am sure we can come up with one) this is /not/ on
the table at the moment.


Received on Monday, 20 July 2009 14:10:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 9 October 2021 18:44:51 UTC