- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2009 21:11:34 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Cc: public-html@w3.org
On Sat, 4 Jul 2009, Sam Ruby wrote: > > Your claim that common codecs aren't required for interop baffles me. Ah, therein lies the misunderstanding. I didn't claim common codecs aren't required for interop (or at least, I didn't intend to make that claim). What I was referring to when I said that something wasn't required for interop was a section describing the status quo of common formats and specifications supported by Web browsers. It was unrelated (except in the most tangential way) to the <video> issue. My apologies for any confusion. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Saturday, 4 July 2009 21:12:17 UTC