Re: Codecs for <video> and <audio>

On 7/2/09 6:37 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
>>> (I've also received requests from browser vendors to not require WAVE
>>> support in the first place, though I have up to this point managed to
>>> convince them to keep WAVE support regardless.)
>>>        
>> That baffles me. I can't think of any reason someone would have a
>> problem supporting Wave PCM.
>>      
>
> As I mentioned, as far as I'm aware the vendor in question will be
> supporting WAVE regardless, so this is a non-issue.
>    

Which browser vendor is it? What's happening here is pretty much the 
opposite of an open process.

- Rob