W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > December 2009

Re: ISSUE-27: rel-ownership - Chairs Solicit Proposals

From: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 04:24:09 +0100
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Cc: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20091217042409406026.7130f3f4@xn--mlform-iua.no>
Leif Halvard Silli, Wed, 16 Dec 2009 18:08:31 +0100:

	[...]
>The use of @rev or @rel informs about the direction the semantics is applied.
	[...]

So, the choice of "rel" vs "rev" has the following effects one the 
semantics of chosen keyword:

1. It governs the _direction_ of the _semantics_;
2. It doesn't affect the start or destination anchor of the
   link, and thus it doesn't affect the link's direction;
3. It doesn't reverse or revert the semantics of any keyword.
-- 
leif halvard silli
Received on Thursday, 17 December 2009 03:25:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:15:55 UTC