- From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
- Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 02:26:14 -0800
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 12:40 AM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: >> There is lots of good data in the bugs I cited. And suggestions for >> further reasearch. >> >> If someone feels passionate about this I suggest they do the remaining >> research as well as getting the know broken sites fixed. *That* has a much >> greater chance of getting implementations to change than anything any spec >> says. > > Step 1 is to *allow* a UA to treat the HTTP content-type as authoritative. I disagree. As a browser developer, data based on research is much more likely to convince me that something will not break the web than a spec forbidding, requiring, allowing or recommending any particular behavior. That is step 1. I really think that if someone spent time on research and evangelism this effort could be solved. What the HTML 5 spec says means little to me. As should be obvious if you read the bugs referenced. / Jonas
Received on Thursday, 10 December 2009 10:27:16 UTC