- From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2009 08:57:00 -0800
- To: HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>
The chairs will discuss the full path forward on Microdata soon and let the WG know about the process and clarifications. In the meantime, I recommend that Manu and Tab review and revise their Change Proposals to take account of each other's rationales and the mailing list discussion. I think the mailing list discussion is not really presenting new arguments any more, just mostly repeating the same arguments. I strongly encourage anyone with an interest in this issue to help Manu and/or Tab respectively. Here are some arguments that I personally think are especially worth addressing in Rationale: - Manu's argument that "Either RDFa or Microdata (or both) may fail in the marketplace" and consequently "If either RDFa or Microdata fail in the marketplace in the long-term, it would be advisable to allow either (or both) to fail without having a negative impact on the HTML5 spec proper." -- not addressed in Tab's Change Proposal. - Tab's argument that "All good specs which integrate with HTML5 should, ideally, be a part of HTML5" (clarified to mean things that are part of the HTML language as such) and his points about why Microdata is good -- not addressed in Manu's Change Proposal - Tab's rebuttals to some of the claims Manu made about RDFa (e.g. argument about whether Microdata is "not mature" relative to other parts of HTML5) -- might be worth providing further counterpoints in Manu's Change Proposal. - Toby's argument that Microdata may be reusable in other specs (e.g. in SVG) and therefore is useful as a separate spec: <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009Dec/0192.html >. It would be good to include this in the "Split Microdata" rationale and address it in the "Keep Microdata" rationale. - Any arguments raised on the mailing list which seem novel and interesting should be incorporated and/or responded to in the rationales. It would be good to get this done soon, although at this point I do not have a specific deadline to announce. Regards, Maciej
Received on Monday, 7 December 2009 16:57:42 UTC