W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > December 2009

Re: Dropping Microdata entirely

From: Shelley Powers <shelley.just@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 08:58:58 -0600
Message-ID: <643cc0270912050658v61ce2c43v711a3201b4001817@mail.gmail.com>
To: HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>
I had forgotten about the TAG request to remove Microdata[1]. This bug
did get tied to Issue 76.

If it is the proper issue, then I will be writing a change proposal
specifically about removing Microdata. It won't be a counter-proposal.
Chairs, is this acceptable, even though, technically, I may be beyond

I can have the proposal finished before next week's teleconference.


[1] http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8220

On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 8:51 AM, Shelley Powers <shelley.just@gmail.com> wrote:
> I had thought about writing a change proposal suggesting we drop
> Microdata entirely, but this doesn't seem to fit Issue 76, which has,
> unfortunately, tangled RDFa and Microdata together. I want to address
> Microdata by itself.
> I think this is something we should discuss, as has been noted in
> other of the discussion threads. Ian also brought it up[1], as have
> others in the discussion thread related to Tab's counter-proposal[2].
> Should I start a new bug specific to this?
> Shelley
> [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009Dec/0173.html
> [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009Dec/0060.html
Received on Saturday, 5 December 2009 14:59:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 9 October 2021 18:45:04 UTC