W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > December 2009

Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification

From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2009 15:04:13 -0800
Cc: Shelley Powers <shelley.just@gmail.com>, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, James Graham <jgraham@opera.com>, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, public-html <public-html@w3.org>
Message-id: <77B472A4-E783-49F8-AC6D-66447A2E7E53@apple.com>
To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>

On Dec 4, 2009, at 2:33 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:

> On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 1:45 PM, Shelley Powers  
> <shelley.just@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> It looks to me like Tab's Change Proposal to keep Microdata has  
>>> six major
>>> points in the Rationale section, only one of which cites RDFa. It  
>>> is fair
>>> game, of course, to question the strength of that point or of any  
>>> of the
>>> five other points.
>>>
>>
>> OK dokee, if people only want to talk about microdata in the context
>> of RDFa, I won't protest. I think it really undermines the  
>> credibility
>> of Microdata, but that's just one's person's opinion.
>
> That doesn't… I don't… You just…
>
> …
>
> WHAT?!?

Please let's try to keep things civil, even when frustrated.

Regards,
Maciej
Received on Friday, 4 December 2009 23:04:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:15:54 UTC