W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > December 2009

Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification

From: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 09:51:50 +0100
To: Philip J├Ągenstedt <philipj@opera.com>
Cc: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, James Graham <jgraham@opera.com>, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, public-html <public-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20091204095150851263.29ac8ed2@xn--mlform-iua.no>
Philip J├Ągenstedt, Fri, 04 Dec 2009 01:36:45 +0100:
> On Fri, 04 Dec 2009 00:19:43 +0100, Maciej Stachowiak:
>> On Dec 3, 2009, at 12:21 PM, James Graham wrote:

> I doubt however that there are very many (any?) individuals who 
> see the two as equally good choices.

RDFa is mature and implemented. Even if microdata technically was as 
good as RDFa, it wouldn't automatically be a equally good choice.
-- 
leif halvard silli
Received on Friday, 4 December 2009 08:52:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:15:54 UTC