- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 14:13:24 -0600
- To: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
- Cc: Shelley Powers <shelley.just@gmail.com>, Jeroen van der Gun <noreplytopreventspam@blijbol.nl>, public-html <public-html@w3.org>
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 1:14 PM, Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no> wrote: > The problem is that <figure>, the way it is defined in the HTML 5 > draft, is *more* than the structure: it must also be possible to refer > to it outside of the context. Please refer to the spec again. It is not *necessary* for the figure to be movable. It is, however, common for it to be so. The definition of <figure> is: "The figure element represents some flow content, optionally with a caption, that is self-contained and is typically referenced as a single unit from the main flow of the document." The bit about it being movable is in the next paragraph, discussing what it can possibly be used for. ~TJ
Received on Wednesday, 2 December 2009 20:13:53 UTC