Anne van Kesteren wrote: > ... >> No. Anything in an RFC is normative unless it's explicitly stated >> otherwise. > > I see. Earlier this month you did not disagree with me on this: > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009Aug/1195.html > ... I did disagree, but did not feel worth mentioning it. > Can you answer my questions assuming the last sentence is dropped. That > is, why is this a requirement for media type registrations and where is > that documented? I don't know whether it's documented (and where), but I think it's obvious as the media type is supposed to describe existing content as well. BR, JulianReceived on Monday, 31 August 2009 11:45:52 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 9 October 2021 18:44:55 UTC