Re: up up up, was: Last Call: draft-nottingham-http-link-header (Web Linking) to Proposed Standard

Ian Hickson wrote:
> ...
>> On the other hand, the advantage you are citing is only an advantage if a
>> given resource only contains "up up up", but not also "up up" and "up". What
>> you be the point of that?
> 
> A UA that treats any number of "up"s as the same would not interpret "up" 
> as "up1", but as meaning that the referenced document was some higher- 
> level document in the hierarchy.
> ...

Again, what would be the point of this case ("up up up" being present, 
but not "up up" and "up")?

BR, Julian

Received on Monday, 31 August 2009 06:25:15 UTC