W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > August 2009

Re: Proposal: <content> element

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 09:55:23 +0200
To: "Ian Hickson" <ian@hixie.ch>, "Maciej Stachowiak" <mjs@apple.com>, "John Drinkwater" <john@nextraweb.com>, "Geoffrey Sneddon" <gsneddon@opera.com>, "James Graham" <jgraham@opera.com>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, "Steven Faulkner" <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>, "Lachlan Hunt" <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>
Cc: "HTML WG" <public-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.uzc4allj64w2qv@annevk-t60>
On Fri, 28 Aug 2009 02:56:41 +0200, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> wrote:
> We already have a way to mark up the content that isn't the header,
> footer, sidebars, or navigation: it's the markup that isn't the <header>,
> <footer>, <aside>, or <nav>.

Yeah, so people will be forced to write crap markup:

   <div role=main>

rather than just:


Having said that, most people will probably use some variation of

   <section id=main>
   <article id=main>

which would be wrong.

Given that we cover 4/5 of the authoring practice regarding structuring  
content we should just complete it in my opinion and not leave people  
confused as to what to do.

Anne van Kesteren
Received on Friday, 28 August 2009 07:56:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 9 October 2021 18:44:54 UTC