- From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 13:55:17 -0700
- To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Cc: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, James Graham <jgraham@opera.com>, public-html@w3.org
On Aug 24, 2009, at 6:12 AM, Sam Ruby wrote: > > +1 > > We had previously decided to publish Ian's draft based in a large > part on a poll entitled "Publish HTML 5 update with or without > warnings?" and Manu withdrawing his draft. At the present time we > have a single draft, which includes warnings. It differs in that > the selection criteria is much clearer than what Manu originally > proposes. > > From what I hear, plenty of people support this draft, but I > desperately don't want to reopen the discussion, so I am asking if > there is *anybody* who would prefer that we publish the editors > draft as it was before this change was made. > > I realize that this is short notice, but I believe that there is a > big win to be had if we publish the current version including > warnings. Since our WD publication has apparently not gone through yet, I favor publishing a more recent version that includes the section status markers, as you suggest. Regards, Maciej
Received on Monday, 24 August 2009 20:55:58 UTC