- From: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
- Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 13:46:05 +0200
- To: Smylers <Smylers@stripey.com>, "HTMLWG WG" <public-html@w3.org>, "W3C WAI-XTECH" <wai-xtech@w3.org>
On Mon, 17 Aug 2009 12:36:19 +0200, Smylers <Smylers@stripey.com> wrote:
> Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis writes:
>
>> On 17/08/2009 10:30, Smylers wrote:
>>
>> > If every instance of alt="" should also have role=presentation then
>> > could we get user-agents to infer that?
...
>> I'm suggesting that not every instance of alt="" should have
>> role="presentation"
(I agree)
> That seems reasonable -- and would be a good reason for not warning all
> authors using alt="" with a specific recommendation to add
> role=presentation.
Not necessarily. The logic runs like this:
There is lots of alt="" out there. Some of it refers to stuff that doesn't
need more text for understanding, and can be effectively treated as
presentation. Adding role="presentation" would help distinguish this, IF
there is some mechanism where authors who care add role="presentation",
while authors who just want to pass a conformance test don't.
In either case, I agree with Maciej that the spec should not tell software
what not to show - dealing with these situations is messy enough that
different heuristics for different users are going to matter for some time
(at least until authoring improves, and I don't think that will be soon...)
cheers
chaals
--
Charles McCathieNevile Opera Software, Standards Group
je parle français -- hablo español -- jeg lærer norsk
http://my.opera.com/chaals Try Opera: http://www.opera.com
Received on Saturday, 22 August 2009 11:46:50 UTC