- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 01:46:43 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Cc: "public-html@w3.org WG" <public-html@w3.org>
On Fri, 21 Aug 2009, Sam Ruby wrote: > Ian Hickson wrote: > > On Fri, 21 Aug 2009, Maciej Stachowiak wrote: > > > That being said, it seems like we need to make a WG decision to go one way > > > or the other, and time is of the essence, since it will take some time to > > > draft an appropriate document once we have decided what to do. > > > > I can write a draft to do this in a few hours, if we decide it's the thing > > to do. It doesn't seem like the thing to do, though. > > Given the following list: > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009Aug/1063.html > > ... at this point, I'm assuming that issues 14, 30, 35 are ones that you > are intending to resolve by Last Call, and of the rest, issue 41 is the > only one that has a significant potential for taking significant time to > integrate should it attract a proposal that we decide is the thing to > do. Let me know if you think differently. I just did 14 and 35 (not sure how they were different). I had to guess as to what ARIA will provide as integration hooks, but we'll fix that later if my guesses were wrong. I thought 30 was resolved long ago. Not sure what needs doing. If it's just open to allow aria-describedby, then that's done too. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Saturday, 22 August 2009 01:46:48 UTC