On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 22:45 -0700, Maciej Stachowiak wrote: > Sam Ruby and Dan Connolly asked me to send proposed issue closures in > individual emails, with clear subject lines, and Cc'd to the issue > originator when possible. Apologies for the spam. If there are no > objections, I will close this issue on 2009-09-03. > > ------------ > > ISSUE-61: conformance-language - Conformance depends on author's intent > http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/61 > > Since it was raised, this issue has not generated follow-up > discussion, actions, or a concrete proposal. The original review comment had a proposal: "Please change the draft so that document conformance does not depend on author's intent at all." -- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2007Aug/1187.html Is that insufficiently concrete? I'd like to see that proposal get some consideration. > It is also lacking a > description. I suggest closing unless someone wants to take an action > to provide a concrete proposal. > > Regards, > Maciej -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29EReceived on Friday, 21 August 2009 13:56:30 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 9 October 2021 18:44:54 UTC