- From: Leif Halvard Silli <lhs@malform.no>
- Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 04:12:21 +0200
- To: Karl Dubost <karl@la-grange.net>
- CC: Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>, public-html <public-html@w3.org>
Karl Dubost On 09-08-16 01.35: > > Le 10 août 2009 à 07:48, Lachlan Hunt a écrit : >> Similarly, the cite attribute duplicates functionality of the <cite> >> elmement combined with <a href>. > > cite attribute on blockquote covers different cases and makes a direct > association between the quoted text and the reference. > # Example 2 > <blockquote cite="urn:isbn:978-0-14-243717-9" xml:lang="en"> > > <p>You don't know me about me, without you have read > a book by the name of "The Adventures of Tom Sawyer," > but that ain't no matter.</p> > <p class="source"> > <cite class="auteur">Twain, Mark</cite>, p. 9. > <cite class="titre">The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn</cite>. > Penguin Classics. 2003 > </p> > </blockquote> In Example 2, you could have reused the code from Example 1, like this: <cite class="author"><a href="http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Twain" >Mark Twain</a></cite> Something which would have been illegal, if the @cite URI had to be replaced with the anchor element. > IMHO, removing the cite attribute on quote is not a very good idea and > doesn't create any benefits. > Making it possible for browser to activate the URI contained in cite > attribute be a lot better (javascript and css can be used already see > below). Indeed. -- leif halvard silli
Received on Sunday, 16 August 2009 02:13:04 UTC