- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 19:36:36 +0200
- To: "Laura Carlson" <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>, "Lachlan Hunt" <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>
- Cc: "HTML WG" <public-html@w3.org>
On Fri, 14 Aug 2009 19:23:51 +0200, Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com> wrote: > As an aid to the scribe, a recording could be helpful after the fact > to repair minutes. > > But if a full recording is offered to the public it is only equitable > to offer a full transcript for people who do not have the option to > listen. > > If you're deaf, hard of hearing, deaf-blind you'll be locked out of > full content. The guidance therefore, according to the Web Content > Accessibility Guidelines, is to provide a transcript. So your opinion is that we should not provide any public recording whatsoever if we cannot commit to also offer a transcript? -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Friday, 14 August 2009 17:37:40 UTC