W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > August 2009

Re: Spec with issue markers [was: Re: HTML5-warnings - request to publish as next heartbeat WD]

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 13:52:25 +0200
Message-ID: <4A854FF9.9080404@gmx.de>
To: James Graham <jgraham@opera.com>
CC: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>
James Graham wrote:
> ...
> OK I will experiment with making the markers more obvious.
> Another idea to throw into the ring is that it would be possible to add 
> information to the annotations file about whether a section has an 
> associated tracker issue. That would allow a link to the issue to be 
> automatically inserted into the status marker along with, possibly, some 
> explanatory text about the fact that the issue must be resolved before 
> the next spec phase transition. Obviously some UI to maintain the list 
> of issues in the annotations file would be needed but that is a solvable 
> problem.
> ...

Links from the spec into the Issue tracker definitively would be good. 
It might be even possible to automate that (by defining a keyword + link 
format, where the link would specify a fragid in the spec).

BR, Julian
Received on Friday, 14 August 2009 11:53:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 9 October 2021 18:44:53 UTC