- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 13:52:25 +0200
- To: James Graham <jgraham@opera.com>
- CC: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>
James Graham wrote: > ... > OK I will experiment with making the markers more obvious. > > Another idea to throw into the ring is that it would be possible to add > information to the annotations file about whether a section has an > associated tracker issue. That would allow a link to the issue to be > automatically inserted into the status marker along with, possibly, some > explanatory text about the fact that the issue must be resolved before > the next spec phase transition. Obviously some UI to maintain the list > of issues in the annotations file would be needed but that is a solvable > problem. > ... Links from the spec into the Issue tracker definitively would be good. It might be even possible to automate that (by defining a keyword + link format, where the link would specify a fragid in the spec). BR, Julian
Received on Friday, 14 August 2009 11:53:12 UTC