Smylers wrote: > Manu Sporny writes: > >> I have updated the HTML5-warnings draft: > >> * All language mentioning "controversial" sections has been changed to >> sections "under active discussion". > >> Each warning can be traced to an unresolved tracker issue that is more >> than 4 months old, a perma-thread conversation (more than 100 messages >> long) that is more than 4 months old, ... > > Those seem like reasonable indicators of something being under active > discussion, in that once the discussions have ceased being active, and > the working group has reached either consensus or a decision on the > matter, the warning would, by definition, be removed. s/or/and/ There are issues where the discussion has ceased, because (I guess) both sides were exhausted. But that doesn't mean that a decision has been made. > ... BR, Julian PS: meta discussions are fun, but what's really important is that we start to make progress on resolving these issues.Received on Friday, 14 August 2009 08:54:11 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 9 October 2021 18:44:53 UTC