- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 10:53:22 +0200
- To: HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>
Smylers wrote: > Manu Sporny writes: > >> I have updated the HTML5-warnings draft: > >> * All language mentioning "controversial" sections has been changed to >> sections "under active discussion". > >> Each warning can be traced to an unresolved tracker issue that is more >> than 4 months old, a perma-thread conversation (more than 100 messages >> long) that is more than 4 months old, ... > > Those seem like reasonable indicators of something being under active > discussion, in that once the discussions have ceased being active, and > the working group has reached either consensus or a decision on the > matter, the warning would, by definition, be removed. s/or/and/ There are issues where the discussion has ceased, because (I guess) both sides were exhausted. But that doesn't mean that a decision has been made. > ... BR, Julian PS: meta discussions are fun, but what's really important is that we start to make progress on resolving these issues.
Received on Friday, 14 August 2009 08:54:11 UTC