- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 18:09:06 +0200
- To: "Toby Inkster" <tai@g5n.co.uk>, "Maciej Stachowiak" <mjs@apple.com>
- Cc: "Shelley Powers" <shelleyp@burningbird.net>, "Sam Ruby" <rubys@intertwingly.net>, "Adrian Bateman" <adrianba@microsoft.com>, "David Singer" <singer@apple.com>, "Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 17:59:48 +0200, Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk> wrote: > On Wed, 2009-08-12 at 18:29 -0700, Maciej Stachowiak wrote: >> But HTML5 would likely have a normative reference to a Canvas API >> spec, so there is a limit. Per W3C rules, you can't normatively >> reference a document that's more than one maturity level apart. > > The solution then seems to be to only include an informative reference. > An example of the current draft with just an informative reference to > the canvas API might be: > > http://buzzword.org.uk/2009/html5/the-canvas-element-20090813.html This does not help postMessage(), which takes an ImageData object. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Thursday, 13 August 2009 16:10:46 UTC