- From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
- Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 05:24:32 -0700
- To: Leif Halvard Silli <lhs@malform.no>
- Cc: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>, HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 4:32 AM, Leif Halvard Silli<lhs@malform.no> wrote: > It is good that ARIA isn't controversial and may replace @longdesc. > > But it seems logical to treat @longdesc exactly the same way as @summary. > Thus if @summary isn't closed, @longdesc shouldn't be closed either. > > For instance, @summary and @longdesc should have the same level of > deprecation/non-deprecation/obsolete-ness. There is no logical > reason to have it otherwise. I'm not sure how this relates to Maciejs email? All it says is that he believes ISSUE-30 is a controversial issue (along with a list of other issues, including ISSUE-32). > As Murray said [1]: > >> 2) I don't see how you reach this conclusion. @summary will >> complete its useful life after ARIA is fully supported, >> deployed and employed. There is no need to push it onto an ice >> flow just yet. We can afford to wait until its replacement is >> actually in place. > > > Hence I suggest not closing ISSUE-30 at this moment. I don't think anyone has suggested otherwise yet? / Jonas
Received on Wednesday, 12 August 2009 12:25:32 UTC