- From: WBS Mailer on behalf of lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au <webmaster@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 20:55:01 +0000
- To: public-html@w3.org
The following answers have been successfully submitted to 'Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings?' (HTML Working Group) for Lachlan Hunt. --------------------------------- Publish draft without warnings? ---- Do you support publishing this Editor's draft (i.e., without the additional warnings, also a.k.a. Ian's draft) as a Working Draft at this time? * (x) Yes * ( ) No Comments (or a URI pointing to your comments): --------------------------------- Publish draft with warnings? ---- Do you support publishing this Editor's draft (i.e., with additional warnings, also a.k.a. Manu's draft) as a Working Draft at this time? In order to provide more useful feedback regarding which warning text should not be considered controversial and thus, should be removed, please follow the suggestions outlined in this email. * ( ) Yes * (x) No Comments (or a URI pointing to your comments): My previous comments http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009Aug/0447.html I concur with these comments from James Graham http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009Aug/0563.html I also concur with Henri's comments about the content of the warnings themselves. --------------------------------- What to publish? ---- Given that these documents differ only in the presence or absence of warnings, how would you like the results of the poll to be interpreted? * ( ) I would prefer to publish all Editor's Drafts that have majority approval as Working Drafts. * (x) I prefer to publish only the one Editor's Draft receiving the most votes as a Working Draft. Comments (or a URI pointing to your comments): Publishing two separate drafts that are almost identical except for a few editorial comments about the stability of some random "controversial" sections does not solve any real problems, and will only serve to create confusion among the wider community. Even though I do not support the draft with extra warnings, I would rather see that one published by itself than have both needlessly published together. These answers were last modified on 11 August 2009 at 20:54:35 U.T.C. by Lachlan Hunt Answers to this questionnaire can be set and changed at http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/ until 2009-08-17. Regards, The Automatic WBS Mailer
Received on Tuesday, 11 August 2009 20:55:10 UTC