- From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
- Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 13:26:02 -0700
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Cc: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 1:03 PM, Ian Hickson<ian@hixie.ch> wrote: > On Tue, 11 Aug 2009, Sam Ruby wrote: >> >> http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/ > > Voting "yes" on both drafts ends up resulting in an abstain if we only > publish one draft, so I voted only for one draft, and then wrote in the > comments that my other vote should be considered a "yes" if we end up > publishing both drafts. Ugh, that's an unfortunate effect of the way the poll is currently formed. I changed my vote to do the same. Sam: In general I'm confused as to why we have this either-or poll at all, my impression of your initial proposal regarding how to publish drafts in the WG was that any draft that had enough contributors would be published. Or was that only meant to apply to editors drafts and not drafts published on w3.org/TR ? Or is this different given that Manus draft contains no technical differences? Sorry, not trying to be difficult, just trying to understand. / Jonas
Received on Tuesday, 11 August 2009 20:26:56 UTC