- From: WBS Mailer on behalf of tantek@cs.stanford.edu <webmaster@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 19:40:01 +0000
- To: tantek@cs.stanford.edu,public-html@w3.org
The following answers have been successfully submitted to 'Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings?' (HTML Working Group) for Tantek Çelik. --------------------------------- Publish draft without warnings? ---- Do you support publishing this Editor's draft (i.e., without the additional warnings, also a.k.a. Ian's draft) as a Working Draft at this time? * (x) Yes * ( ) No Comments (or a URI pointing to your comments): Inline warnings simply clutter up the draft. There is already an issue tracking system, and I would be ok with a link to the issue tracking system, but I don't think it is required for this working draft. --------------------------------- Publish draft with warnings? ---- Do you support publishing this Editor's draft (i.e., with additional warnings, also a.k.a. Manu's draft) as a Working Draft at this time? In order to provide more useful feedback regarding which warning text should not be considered controversial and thus, should be removed, please follow the suggestions outlined in this email. * ( ) Yes * (x) No Comments (or a URI pointing to your comments): --------------------------------- What to publish? ---- Given that these documents differ only in the presence or absence of warnings, how would you like the results of the poll to be interpreted? * ( ) I would prefer to publish all Editor's Drafts that have majority approval as Working Drafts. * (x) I prefer to publish only the one Editor's Draft receiving the most votes as a Working Draft. Comments (or a URI pointing to your comments): These answers were last modified on 11 August 2009 at 19:39:49 U.T.C. by Tantek Çelik Answers to this questionnaire can be set and changed at http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/ until 2009-08-17. Regards, The Automatic WBS Mailer
Received on Tuesday, 11 August 2009 19:40:11 UTC