- From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
- Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 12:00:11 -0700
- To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Cc: HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 11:58 AM, Jonas Sicking<jonas@sicking.cc> wrote: > Isn't 4 what has happened? Is there a specific WAI/PFWG rule that the > suggested rule of using <caption> violates? The part that hasn't > happened is marking it controversial I guess, is that what you are > referring to that keeps step 4 from being fulfilled? Sorry, that should say "...the suggested *solution* of using <caption> violates..." / Jonas
Received on Tuesday, 11 August 2009 19:01:14 UTC