- From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 19:23:16 -0400
- To: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
- CC: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
Jonas Sicking wrote: > On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 2:31 PM, Sam Ruby<rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote: >>> Or is the answer something altogether different given that this is >>> just a poll and not a formal vote? >> We are at the point where I am simply going to make an informed decision and >> proceed based on the results of this poll. That decision will not be >> binding on any future decision. For example, no matter what the outcome, it >> does not mean that summary couldn't become either fully conforming or fully >> non-conforming in subsequent Working Drafts. > > Oh, I just realized that one option is to simply publish Manu's draft > in order to fulfill the heartbeat requirement, but then continue > business as usual with Ian's document published as editors drafts. At > the time of the next heartbeat (or anytime before that) we'll decide > again which document to publish. That certainly is an option. But at the present time, Maciej objects to that option, so we will have a poll. Either way, both Ian and Manu and others are welcome (and even encouraged) to continue to develop and publish editors drafts. - Sam Ruby
Received on Monday, 10 August 2009 23:23:58 UTC