- From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 16:13:25 -0400
- To: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
Sam Ruby wrote: > 1) Do you support publishing the following Editor's draft (i.e., without > the additional warnings) as a Working Draft at this time: > > http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/Overview.html > > 2) Do you support publishing the following Editor's draft (i.e., with > additional warnings) as a Working Draft at this time: > > http://html5.digitalbazaar.com/specs/html5-warnings.html > > 3) Do you support the idea of publishing both draft a draft with > additional warnings and a draft without warnings, should both have > sufficient support? > > I hope with all of the discussion and with this description, and > examples, the options and process are crystal clear. If there is > anything unclear at all, I ask that people speak up at this time. I requested that a text box should be added to the poll in order to meet Maciej (and others) half-way re: removing sections that are deemed to not be controversial. This is, to me, the most useful feedback for the poll and is part of the reason I'm insisting that there is a poll. The text box would allow voters to assert that certain sections should be removed from the HTML5-warnings draft. Here is a list of all of the changes: http://html5.digitalbazaar.com/specs/html5-warnings-diff.html#editor-s-draft-date-08-August-2009 http://html5.digitalbazaar.com/specs/html5-warnings-diff.html#urls http://html5.digitalbazaar.com/specs/html5-warnings-diff.html#fetch http://html5.digitalbazaar.com/specs/html5-warnings-diff.html#misinterpreted-for-compatibility http://html5.digitalbazaar.com/specs/html5-warnings-diff.html#implied-strong-reference http://html5.digitalbazaar.com/specs/html5-warnings-diff.html#other-metadata-names http://html5.digitalbazaar.com/specs/html5-warnings-diff.html#microdata http://html5.digitalbazaar.com/specs/html5-warnings-diff.html#predefined-type http://html5.digitalbazaar.com/specs/html5-warnings-diff.html#obsolete http://html5.digitalbazaar.com/specs/html5-warnings-diff.html#the-source-element http://html5.digitalbazaar.com/specs/html5-warnings-diff.html#alt http://html5.digitalbazaar.com/specs/html5-warnings-diff.html#the-head-element http://html5.digitalbazaar.com/specs/html5-warnings-diff.html#navigating-across-documents http://html5.digitalbazaar.com/specs/html5-warnings-diff.html#the-bb-element A voter would be able to vote for a combination of options 1, 2 and 3 that you specified at the top of this document as well as enter something like the following in the text box: REMOVE warnings on #the-bb-element, #implied-strong-reference REWORD #alt, #urls REMOVE and REWORD requests with at least 25% of the voting body will result in those changes being made before the HTML5-warnings draft is published (as a heartbeat WD). -- manu -- Manu Sporny (skype: msporny) (twitter: manusporny) President/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. blog: Bitmunk 3.1 Released - Browser-based P2P Commerce http://blog.digitalbazaar.com/2009/06/29/browser-based-p2p-commerce/
Received on Monday, 10 August 2009 20:14:03 UTC