- From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 11:52:56 -0400
- To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- CC: HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>
Manu Sporny wrote: > You and Ian are questioning my motives for asking for the HTML5-warnings > document to be published as a WD. Rather than let you assert what my > intentions are, we should address these dubious claims head on: I won't question your motives, but I will note that the issues mentioned in your draft in the Microdata[1] section weren't previously raised as an Issue[2]. I'll also ask when/where was "An additional alternative that is being proposed is the removal of Microdata and RDFa from the HTML5 specification" raised? I've seen a (preliminary, not submitted tot he WG) proposal from you to include RDFa alongside Microdata, but I don't recall a proposal to remove Microdata. Note: I am not suggesting that your draft be revised. If there is an issue and/or a proposal, I simply want to track it or them. - Sam Ruby [1] http://html5.digitalbazaar.com/specs/html5-warnings-diff.html#microdata [2] http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues
Received on Monday, 10 August 2009 15:53:36 UTC