- From: Toby A Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
- Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 16:44:21 +0100
- To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Cc: HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>, WHATWG <whatwg@lists.whatwg.org>
On 9 Aug 2009, at 14:32, Manu Sporny wrote: > 2. Two other independent voices to support the publishing of this > draft. > Without those voices, this proposal cannot be considered for > publishing. I think you already have those two other voices. FWIW, I agree that warnings about controversial passages of the draft - areas "at risk" - should be included in a published draft. They may turn out to be very valuable for early adopters of HTML5. For people whom development time comes at a premium, it may be important to avoid areas of HTML5 which are very likely to change before final publication. Conversely, those who have a lot of development time on their hands could even be encouraged to experiment in the more "at risk" parts of HTML5, so that they can feedback their experience to this group. I've not spent enough time reading Manu's edition of the HTML5 draft to decide whether the particular parts he's highlighted are the best parts to mark "at risk" (and perhaps even getting consensus on this list of parts to highlight could be daunting) but I certainly agree that in principle such parts should be noted. -- Toby A Inkster <mailto:mail@tobyinkster.co.uk> <http://tobyinkster.co.uk>
Received on Monday, 10 August 2009 15:45:01 UTC