Maciej Stachowiak wrote: > > On Aug 4, 2009, at 1:29 PM, Julian Reschke wrote: > >> >>> ... >>>> I agree it's good to make sure @summary is used for what it's there; >>>> I'm not yet convinced that an unconditional validator warning is the >>>> right way to get there, though. >>> Do you think it's acceptable as part of a compromise, even if you're >>> not sure it's ideal? >>> ... >> >> No, not really, as the behavior of validators really is a key question >> here (next to the (current) guidance not to use it). > > What do you think is the proper validator behavior on encountering > summary="" - keeping in mind that providing no guidance at all to > authors is likely to be unacceptable to many people? If by summary="" you mean an *empty* attribute, then yes, I think that should generate a warning. Another case for a warning might be summary text that is repeated in the table caption. BR, JulianReceived on Tuesday, 4 August 2009 20:36:52 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 9 October 2021 18:44:53 UTC