On Monday 2009-08-03 19:50 -0700, L. David Baron wrote: > Well, if you can point me to where the argument for keeping @summary > was actually made, I could respond to it, but I haven't actually > seen it. And that's the problem. I retract the claim that it hasn't been made; I think these messages make a decent argument for it: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009Jun/0179.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009Jun/0185.html I'm not in a position to weigh those use cases against the other problems, so I'll withdraw from this debate. I regret that such a coherent explanation was not present in these messages: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2009Jun/0026.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2008Aug/0213.html -David -- L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ Mozilla Corporation http://www.mozilla.com/Received on Tuesday, 4 August 2009 04:06:14 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 9 October 2021 18:44:53 UTC