- From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
- Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 15:51:11 -0700
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Cc: Jeff Schiller <codedread@gmail.com>, public-html@w3.org, www-svg <www-svg@w3.org>
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 11:35 AM, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> wrote: > On Mon, 27 Apr 2009, Jeff Schiller wrote: >> On 4/26/09, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> wrote: >> > On Wed, 25 Mar 2009, Jeff Schiller wrote: >> > > >> > > Can you please change to >> > > >> > > "user agents are strongly encouraged ..." >> > >> > What difference would the word "strongly" make? >> >> Since you obviously understand the word 'strongly' and do not need a >> lesson on what an adverb does, can you clarify the reason you do not >> want to strengthen the language of this paragraph in some way? > > The spec uses the phrase "user agents are encouraged" many times, but it's > not clear why in comparison to those, this one should be "strongly" > encouraged. Why is it more important that user agents provide a UI that > allows extraction of XML snippets from an HTML document than it is that > user agents offer to the user the ability to abort scripts that are taking > all the computer's CPU? And more importantly, why do you expect a UA implementor to pay more attention to something that the spec 'strongly encourages' than something that the spec 'encourages'? As a UA implementor I think I tend to pay more attention to what *I* think is important today than what the spec author thought was important when the spec was written. / Jonas
Received on Monday, 27 April 2009 22:52:03 UTC