- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2009 08:15:58 +0000
- To: public-html@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6763
Summary: Inconsistent use of American and British English
Product: HTML WG
Version: unspecified
Platform: All
URL: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: Spec bugs
AssignedTo: dave.null@w3.org
ReportedBy: jens@meiert.com
QAContact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
CC: ian@hixie.ch, mike@w3.org, public-html@w3.org
(Apologies for not searching W3C Bugzilla for duplicates.)
The spec draft currently uses both American and British English. While I’m
not a 100 % sure if W3C documents aren’t and shouldn’t be usually written
in American English anyway, making this consistent would definitely be helpful.
In case we’d like to default to American English, here’s a list of words in
the spec that seem to be of British origin:
* behaviour
* categorise/categorised
* colour/coloured
* emphasised
* favour
* favourite
* flavours
* honour
* optimise
* recognise/recognised
* serialise/serialisation
* tokeniser
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Friday, 3 April 2009 08:16:10 UTC