- From: James Graham <jgraham@opera.com>
- Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2009 12:04:03 +0200
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- CC: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
Dan Connolly wrote: > On Wed, 2009-04-01 at 09:56 -0400, Sam Ruby wrote: >> Ian Hickson wrote: > [...] >>> ISSUE-20 (table-headers): Improvements to the table-headers algorithm in >>> the HTML 5 spec >> Michael(tm) Smith ensured that Ian Hickson follows up... last year >> >> I suggested that this item be closed given that we have not received any >> feedback, but DanC objected. > > Let's see... that was > http://www.w3.org/2009/02/26-html-wg-minutes.html#item01 > > Perhaps I advised against closing it during the discussion... > ("objected" suggests you put a question and I formally objected...) FIW my recollection of the email discussion is that the only reason not to close this issue was the lack of testcases.
Received on Thursday, 2 April 2009 10:04:45 UTC