W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > October 2008

Re: <q>

From: Sam Kuper <sam.kuper@uclmail.net>
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 22:09:24 +0000
Message-ID: <4126b3450810291509g5b426ab7se1cc592354193781@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Justin James" <j_james@mindspring.com>
Cc: "Daniel Glazman" <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>, "HTML WG" <public-html@w3.org>
2008/10/29 Justin James <j_james@mindspring.com>

> So now, you want to tied dozens of other standards to HTML,

There's nothing new (or awful) about having an HTML spec reference other
documents, especially documents produced by other standards institutions.

> just to implement... quotation marks around the <q> tag?

No, not just quotation marks. Appropriate styling, which means, as has
already been established in this thread, something more complex than "just
quotation marks" (but, I am certain, not intractably complex).

> A group of standards so uncommon, that in the case of one of the most
> spoken languages on the planet, the printed version is not available from
> Amazon UK?

It's a *French* standard. It's readily available in France.

> And what happens when the document is written from the perspective of an
>  non-standard dialect? The author loses the ability to safely use <q>?

No, the author would get the default styling for the specified language. If
that wasn't appropriate, then the author could override it, but in such a
case, it's dubious that the language attribute would be correct either.


Received on Wednesday, 29 October 2008 22:09:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:15:38 UTC