- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 09:19:40 +0200
- To: "Mark Baker" <distobj@acm.org>, "Michael(tm) Smith" <mike@w3.org>
- Cc: public-html@w3.org
On Fri, 27 Jun 2008 19:06:14 +0200, Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org> wrote: > Somebody suggested "HTML URL" on uri@w3.org - I think that's a better > option because its makes the distinction more apparent. Since I'd expect, e.g. XMLHttpRequest and other specifications to adopt this URL definition as well, "HTML URL" is somewhat strange. Given the note in the specification I think URL is fine and consistent with e.g. <input type=url>, url(), and toDataURL(). -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Saturday, 28 June 2008 07:20:28 UTC