- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 20:07:52 +0200
- To: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- CC: "Michael(tm) Smith" <mike@w3.org>, public-html@w3.org
Mark Baker wrote: > ... > RFC 3986 doesn't define URL, so there's no problem from that POV. But > ... "... The term "Uniform Resource Locator" (URL) refers to the subset of URIs that, in addition to identifying a resource, provide a means of locating the resource by describing its primary access mechanism (e.g., its network "location")...." -- <http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3986#section-1.1.3> > I do think a lot of implementers might make the mistake of assuming > that html5:URL == rfc3986:URI, and, say, reuse URI libraries when they > should be using an HTML-aware one. Yes. > Somebody suggested "HTML URL" on uri@w3.org - I think that's a better > option because its makes the distinction more apparent. So far that's the best candidate I have heard of. BR, Julian
Received on Friday, 27 June 2008 18:08:35 UTC