- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 09:55:19 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
On Tue, 24 Jun 2008, Julian Reschke wrote: > > Looking at <http://krijnhoetmer.nl/irc-logs/whatwg/20080624#l-217>: > > > # # [04:07] <Hixie> parsing a URI reference requires knowing the scheme of > > the base URI > > # # [04:07] <Hixie> someone please write URI5 so i don't have to deal with > > this nonsense > > It seems you think something is wrong with RFC3986, right? In which case > the right thing to do is to send an email to the IETF URI mailing list, > asking for clarification. Oh, I wasn't aware that there was an active working group maintaining the URI specs. That would make my life much easier. I'll contact the group immediately. Thanks for the heads-up. > That being said, I'm not aware of any issues with this. Care to > elaborate? The URI specs don't define anything to do with error handling. The IRI specs are incompatible with legacy non-UTF-8 content. Those are the main problems, I think. You can see the work-in-progress for working around these issues here: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#urls I try to defer to URI (3986), IRI (3987), XML Base, and IDN (3490) as much as possible. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Tuesday, 24 June 2008 09:56:03 UTC