- From: Erik Wilde <dret@berkeley.edu>
- Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2008 17:21:47 -0700
- To: public-html@w3.org
hello everybody. about two weeks ago, i posted a short message about the idea to improve fragment identifiers in html; the original message can be found here: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2008May/0509.html basically, i proposed to extend html's fragment identification method by allowing to identify fragments without an @id. nobody replied, so apparently this idea is not met with great enthusiasm. however, i still think this could be useful, and i would be grateful to get some feedback about this idea. most importantly, i am wondering whether people think this is a bad idea and should not be done, or whether people think this simply would not be implemented and/or useful. so i don't expect anybody to suddenly become enthusiastic about this idea, but just hearing some of the reasons for the lack of enthusiasm would be interesting as well. thanks and kind regards, erik wilde tel:+1-510-6432253 - fax:+1-510-6425814 dret@berkeley.edu - http://dret.net/netdret UC Berkeley - School of Information (ISchool)
Received on Saturday, 7 June 2008 00:22:43 UTC